<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corrections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com</link>
	<description>SAT/ACT prep &#38; college coaching from the author of OUTSMARTING the SAT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:21:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Hi there.... Did we get that fixed? ~e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there&#8230;. Did we get that fixed? ~e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Also Elizabeth on my Firefox Browser (PC) your banner header is getting cut off so people can&#039;t get your phone number!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Elizabeth on my Firefox Browser (PC) your banner header is getting cut off so people can&#8217;t get your phone number!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Outsmarting is a great book but here are a few more typos-

p. 102, bottom should read &quot;the product of point b and e is closest to the value of point c&quot;

p. 104, Example 1 - should read which of the following is equal to a2 - b2, not b2 - a2.  b2-a2 would be negative since a&gt;b.

p. 302, at the top &quot;All you can do is house the dogs you have&quot; should probably read more like this: &quot;all you can do is put dogs in the houses you have&quot; since we don&#039;t lack dogs, we lack houses.

p. 302, near the bottom, the list of &quot;a&quot; combinations of &quot;abc abd abf... aef&quot; is missing one: &quot;abe&quot;

p. 311 I could be wrong but I&#039;m pretty sure there&#039;s no way to construct a box (that doesn&#039;t overlap on one side and is empty on the other) from the rightmost example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outsmarting is a great book but here are a few more typos-</p>
<p>p. 102, bottom should read &#8220;the product of point b and e is closest to the value of point c&#8221;</p>
<p>p. 104, Example 1 &#8211; should read which of the following is equal to a2 &#8211; b2, not b2 &#8211; a2.  b2-a2 would be negative since a&gt;b.</p>
<p>p. 302, at the top &#8220;All you can do is house the dogs you have&#8221; should probably read more like this: &#8220;all you can do is put dogs in the houses you have&#8221; since we don&#8217;t lack dogs, we lack houses.</p>
<p>p. 302, near the bottom, the list of &#8220;a&#8221; combinations of &#8220;abc abd abf&#8230; aef&#8221; is missing one: &#8220;abe&#8221;</p>
<p>p. 311 I could be wrong but I&#8217;m pretty sure there&#8217;s no way to construct a box (that doesn&#8217;t overlap on one side and is empty on the other) from the rightmost example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-262</guid>
		<description>um on pg. 108 example 2: level3 the equation should be: 
1/7 * 7a =  3c/11 * 1/7
not: 1/7 * 7a =  3c/11 * 1/77 ...i think...
:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um on pg. 108 example 2: level3 the equation should be:<br />
1/7 * 7a =  3c/11 * 1/7<br />
not: 1/7 * 7a =  3c/11 * 1/77 &#8230;i think&#8230;<br />
 <img src='http://www.elizabethonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudman Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudman Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to &quot;pour&quot; over the book!

Shouldn&#039;t that be PORE over the book? 

Re: errors -  Every SAT book I&#039;ve ever used has its share of errors.
I&#039;m shallow for noticing this, but the author of Outsmarting the SAT looks quite attractive.

spudman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to &#8220;pour&#8221; over the book!</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t that be PORE over the book? </p>
<p>Re: errors &#8211;  Every SAT book I&#8217;ve ever used has its share of errors.<br />
I&#8217;m shallow for noticing this, but the author of Outsmarting the SAT looks quite attractive.</p>
<p>spudman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-229</guid>
		<description>These errors have since been adjusted on the errors pdf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These errors have since been adjusted on the errors pdf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Good point. The whole question should probably be rewritten. Great eye, Julian! Thanks for taking the time to help us out while we prepare for the next edition!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. The whole question should probably be rewritten. Great eye, Julian! Thanks for taking the time to help us out while we prepare for the next edition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-211</guid>
		<description>In example 2 on page 214, shouldn&#039;t the problem state the FACTORS rather than the multiples?  Otherwise I don&#039;t see how 60 would contain ALL the multiples of 3, 4, and 5 (it would of course contain some of all of them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In example 2 on page 214, shouldn&#8217;t the problem state the FACTORS rather than the multiples?  Otherwise I don&#8217;t see how 60 would contain ALL the multiples of 3, 4, and 5 (it would of course contain some of all of them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethonline.com/outsmarting-the-sat-2/errors-in-the-book/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethonline.com/?page_id=362#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Browsed the site, looked at the error page, and found an error on the error page
&lt;blockquote&gt; p. 126 ex. 1 my fault: 3 x 12 is and always will be 48, not 36.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nope. 3 * 12 is and always will be 36, not 48. Unless there&#039;s some syntax that I&#039;m missing.

&lt;blockquote&gt; p. 212 The given problem in paragraph three should be 4  2; I solved it as 
though it were. &lt;/blockquote&gt; I assume I&#039;m missing syntax, but it looks like a sentence fragment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browsed the site, looked at the error page, and found an error on the error page</p>
<blockquote><p> p. 126 ex. 1 my fault: 3 x 12 is and always will be 48, not 36.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope. 3 * 12 is and always will be 36, not 48. Unless there&#8217;s some syntax that I&#8217;m missing.</p>
<blockquote><p> p. 212 The given problem in paragraph three should be 4  2; I solved it as<br />
though it were. </p></blockquote>
<p> I assume I&#8217;m missing syntax, but it looks like a sentence fragment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
